×
Jul 1, 2021 · Peer review: The eLife editorial process has two outputs: i) public comments from the peer reviewers on the strengths and weaknesses of the work ...
People also ask
eLife reviews preprints in the life sciences and medicine, and is committed to improving peer review to better convey the assessments made by editors and ...
Missing: 00f2f185/ | Show results with:00f2f185/
Apr 27, 2022 · Ensuring that public feedback on preprints is focused, appropriate, specific and transparent (or FAST) will help to develop a thriving ...
Missing: latest- | Show results with:latest-
Jan 16, 2024 · Reviewed Preprints offer researchers an open and transparent way to share their research and receive fair assessment and feedback quickly.
Missing: 00f2f185/ | Show results with:00f2f185/
Apr 25, 2022 · A long-time advocate for open science, Hutton will lead eLife's transformation to a 'publish, then review' model that puts preprints first.
Jul 1, 2021 · Preprint servers including medRxiv and bioRxiv offer a clear warning to readers that the content of research hasn't been formally peer reviewed, ...
Missing: 00f2f185/ | Show results with:00f2f185/
The global public health emergency drove researchers to deposit preprints as they awaited peer review in a journal, a practice that became widely embraced by ...
... https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ato ... peer review was mentioned. How is that valuable ... in editing timelines between open and closed review?
Nov 22, 2022 · Scholarly publishing is evolving, and there is a need to understand and design the new (emergent) workflows while also designing technology ...
Apr 27, 2022 · Importantly, by encouraging this public interaction and articulating what we value in preprint feedback, we can also enable new ways to reward ...
Missing: latest- | Show results with:latest-